<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>On Style on Everything is Oll Korrect!</title>
    <link>https://itsollkorrect.com/blog/tags/on-style/</link>
    <description>Recent content in On Style on Everything is Oll Korrect!</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://itsollkorrect.com/blog/tags/on-style/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Demetrius and the Greek Guide to Style</title>
      <link>https://itsollkorrect.com/blog/2026/demetrius/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://itsollkorrect.com/blog/2026/demetrius/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One pervasive problem with the way that literature is taught today, perhaps &lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt; pervasive problem, is the lack of any framework for understanding and evaluating it. Typically, a class at the high school or college level is assigned some reading, perhaps with some background about the book or author, but then the lecture period is little more than a book club facilitated by the instructor. Students are asked for their opinions about this or that aspect of the novel (or poem, play, whatever), but no definitive interpretation or means of assessing the quality of the work is given. In my time as a Literature major at college, there was really only one professor who did otherwise, and it was in his course on Shakespeare that I first encountered Aristotle’s &lt;em&gt;Poetics&lt;/em&gt; (which we’ve &lt;a href=&#34;https://itsollkorrect.com/blog/aristotles-poetics/&#34;&gt;discussed previously&lt;/a&gt;) and today’s author, Demetrius.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
